ColonoscopyAssist
A single all-inclusive prepaid price for a screening colonoscopy, covering the facility, the physician, anaesthesia, and pathology.
Best for
Uninsured people who are due for colorectal cancer screening and have put it off because of cost.
Why Kave includes this
A colonoscopy is the textbook case of a procedure quoted as one number and billed as four — facility, physician, anaesthesia, pathology — and the surprise bills land weeks later. Bundling all four into one prepaid price removes the specific failure mode. Kave rates the patient impact high because a screening deferred for cost is the most expensive kind of delay there is.
- Expected cost
- One prepaid package price covering facility, physician, anaesthesia, and pathology, published before booking.
- Insurance requirement
- Cash-pay. Does not bill insurance. If you have coverage, screening colonoscopy is usually a no-cost preventive benefit — check that first.
- Who qualifies
- Open to anyone within the participating centres' service areas. No income test.
- Where it is available
- Nationwide (United States)
- How you use it
- In person
- Languages
- English
Limitations Kave wants you to know about
- If you have insurance, screening colonoscopy is often covered at no cost — use that instead.
- Participating centres are limited to certain metropolitan areas.
- Treatment found during the procedure may fall outside the package price.
Verification
Compiled by Kave on July 1, 2026 and link-checked. Not yet independently verified. Kave assembled this from the organisation’s own published material and confirmed the links resolve. No reviewer has confirmed the eligibility details against the source, so check them on the official site before you rely on them.
- Compiled
- July 1, 2026 (28 days ago)
- Next scheduled review
- September 29, 2026
- Reviewed by
- Not yet reviewed
Sources used
- ColonoscopyAssist — read July 1, 2026
Kave quality score
78/100
Kave lists resources scoring 80 or above that also clear all four mandatory gates.
- Patient impact21/25
- Affordability or financial value15.6/20
- Transparency13.8/15
- Accessibility9.6/15
- Ease of use7.8/10
- Privacy and data practices3.4/5
- Geographic reach3.3/5
- Institutional credibility3.2/5
Geographic reach is deliberately worth only five points, so a strong local resource is not pushed out by a weak national one. Read the methodology.