CDC National Diabetes Prevention Program registry
The official registry of recognised lifestyle-change programs shown to reduce the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, offered in person and online.
Best for
Anyone told they have prediabetes or a high risk of type 2 diabetes.
Why Kave includes this
This is one of the few prevention programs with strong outcome evidence behind it, it is covered by Medicare and many plans, and many community versions are free. Kave lists the CDC registry rather than any individual provider because recognition is what separates an evidence-based program from a wellness product.
- Expected cost
- Many community programs are free. Medicare covers the recognised program for eligible beneficiaries, and many commercial plans cover it too.
- Insurance requirement
- None for many community programs.
- Who qualifies
- Adults at increased risk of type 2 diabetes, usually established by a blood test or a risk questionnaire.
- Where it is available
- Nationwide (United States)
- How you use it
- In person and Online or by phone
- Languages
- English and Spanish
Limitations Kave wants you to know about
- Prevention, not treatment — this is for people who do not yet have diabetes.
- A year-long commitment with regular sessions.
- Cost and availability vary by provider and location.
Verification
Compiled by Kave on July 1, 2026 and link-checked. Not yet independently verified. Kave assembled this from the organisation’s own published material and confirmed the links resolve. No reviewer has confirmed the eligibility details against the source, so check them on the official site before you rely on them.
- Compiled
- July 1, 2026 (28 days ago)
- Next scheduled review
- September 29, 2026
- Reviewed by
- Not yet reviewed
Sources used
- CDC Diabetes Prevention Recognition Program registry — read July 1, 2026
Kave quality score
84/100
Kave lists resources scoring 80 or above that also clear all four mandatory gates.
- Patient impact20.5/25
- Affordability or financial value17.2/20
- Transparency12.9/15
- Accessibility12/15
- Ease of use7.4/10
- Institutional credibility5/5
- Geographic reach4.6/5
- Privacy and data practices4.5/5
Geographic reach is deliberately worth only five points, so a strong local resource is not pushed out by a weak national one. Read the methodology.